Aurona.ai

Compare AI models side by side

Aurona Chat Playground

Run one prompt through multiple approved models, inspect the route trace, and export the same request shape to your API workflow.

Active comparison

Three-model route with live credit guardrails

0.184 credits estimated

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic

96

route

primary

context

1M

price

$15.00 / $75.00

Kimi K2.7 Code

MoonshotAI

90

route

specialist

context

262K

price

$0.740 / $3.50

DeepSeek R1 0528

DeepSeek

90

route

value fallback

context

164K

price

$0.500 / $2.15

Router

Fusion Code

3-model judge with approved fallback

Policy

Zero retention

private customer data is isolated

Credits

0.184 est.

budget ceiling and ledger preview

Run #12 result

0.184 credits

Aurona compared Claude, Kimi, and DeepSeek, then returned a production code-review recommendation with the full route trace. The response includes full trace for aurona/fusion-code.

route

aurona/fusion-code

policy

budget passed

fallback

approved-only

latency

1.1s p50

winner

Claude Sonnet

export

full JSON

{
  "model": "aurona/fusion-code",
  "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Review this pull request for security, correctness, and cost. Compare the model outputs and recommend a production route." }],
  "tools": true,
  "return_trace": true,
  "budget": { "max_credit": "0.25" }
}

User

Compare the best route for a code review agent with private customer data.

Aurona

I will run a code-aware comparison across Claude Opus 4.8, Kimi K2.7 Code, and DeepSeek R1. The route requires zero retention, fallback enabled, and a max credit budget of 0.25.

Route trace

Policy matched: ZDR. Provider sorting: throughput first. Fallback allowed: approved-only. Estimated credits: 0.184.